The Journals [Minutes] of the Council of Bishops of The RUSSIAN ORTHODOX CHURCH ABROAD
Meetings
of the Council of Bishops of the Russian Orthodox Church Outside of
Russia held a meeting on 27 October, 2016 in Odessa, Ukraine.
Participants: His Eminence Metropolitan Agafangel, Chairman
and First Hierarch of the Council of Bishops of ROCA; and Their
Eminences: Archbishop George (Secretary), Bishop Athanassy, Bishop
Gregory, Bishop Nikon, Bishop Nicholas, Bishop Anastassy, Bishop Roman,
Bishop Anthim, and Archbishop John and Bishop Kirill who took part in
the meetings of the Council, over Skype.
Also Present: Members of the Higher Church Authority: Abbot John (Smelic) and Archpriest Leonid Plyats.
JOURNAL №1
Received: Proposition for the Agenda by the Chairman.
Resolved: To adopt the agenda of the meeting of the Synod of Bishops in the following form:
1. Report of the President. [by Metropolitan Agafangel].
2. On the joining into our ROCA of Bishop Anastassy and his Far East diocese to ROCA .
3. Report of the bishops on the situation in their dioceses.
4. On the Ecclesiastical Court which was held.
5. On the new non-Orthodox teaching.
6.
On the actions and statements of the very reverend Archbishops Andronik
and Sofrony and their supporting clergy and laity, after the
Ecclesiastical Court.
7. Conference of the territories of North and South America and Canada.
8. Diocesan boundaries.
9. On the Synodal building.[in the USA].
10. Synodal representation [the ROCA Offices next to the St. Michael's Church], in Odessa.
11. On the composition of the Synod of Bishops.
12. Supreme Church Council.
13. The convening of the 6th All-Diaspora Council.
14. Replenishment of the episcopate.
15. Miscellaneous.
JOURNAL №2
Discussed: The petition of Bishop Anastassy [Anastasius] to be accepted into ROCA.
Resolved: In accordance with his request, His Eminence Anastassy and the Far Eastern Diocese were accepted into ROCA.
JOURNAL №3
Received: The Chairman's report.
Resolved: The Council took note of the Chairman's report.
JOURNAL №4
Discussed: The status of widowed priests and those ordained to the priesthood as widowers or while unmarried.
Resolved:
To recommend that widowed priests and priests ordained to the
priesthood as widowers or as the unmarried, should receive the tonsure
as rassophore monks.
JOURNAL №5
Received: The reports of the Bishops on the situation in their dioceses.
Resolved: The Council took note of the Bishops' reports.
Their Graces sang "Eternal Memory" to Archpriest Gregory Williams.
JOURNAL №6
Discussed: Regarding the nourishment [support of] the Mission in Haiti.
Resolved:
To instruct His Eminence Vladyka Gregory,[of Sao Paulo, and All-South
America][ to undertake the spiritual care for the Mission in Haiti
JOURNAL №7
Discussed:
The report of the Ecclesiastical Court of the Holy Synod which was held
regarding the case of Archbishops Andronik and Sophrony.
Resolved:
Since more than two weeks have past, from the announcement of the
judgment, and their Eminences Andronik and Sophrony did not follow up
with a statement of their intention to appeal under section 77 of the
Regulations on the Ecclesiastical Court of the ROCA, the decision of the
Ecclesiastical Court of the Synod of Bishops Court has come into force
and it is not subject to discussion in an appeal. It was noted that the
Most Reverends Andronik and Sophrony have not complied with the decision
of the court, and that they continue to conduct their affairs [as if
they were still] ruling bishops.
“Bishops
sentenced by the Court of the Synod of Bishops have the right to file
an appeal against the judgment before the supreme Court of the next
regular Council of Bishops within six months after receipt of the
Court's judgment. They must communicate their intention to appeal within two weeks after receipt of the Court's verdict.”
JOURNAL №8
Discussed: The report of the Chairman “on the heresy of schism-ecumenism”
Resolved:
The group of believers led by their retired Eminences Andronik and
Sophrony have published a doctrine that the local Russian Orthodox
Church has split into fragments which are equally
saving and grace-filled, but which however, do not have prayerful,
administrative communion or sacramental communion with each other. Further, that these fragments together
constitute the Orthodox Russian Church.The Council of Bishops cannot
accept this doctrine as Orthodox, and considers it a form of the heresy
of ecumenism. Moreover, this teaching is contrary to Decree № 362 [of
the Holy Patriarch Tikhon] regarding the Higher Church Authority of the
Russian Orthodox Church, which obliges scattered groups of believers to
create a unified management, instead of justifying, and multiplying schisms. As regards those who oppose the creation of a unified management, the Decree instructs to: interrupt communion with such.
JOURNAL №9
Discussed:
The draft Statement of the Council of Bishops of ROCA in connection
with the non-Orthodox teaching of the group of supporters of Archbishops
Andronik and Sophrony.
Resolved:
To approve the draft Statement proposed by the Chairman of the Bishops
Council of of ROCA, in connection with the non-Orthodox teaching -of
the groups supporting Archbishops Andronik and Sophrony.
JOURNAL №10
Discussed:
The actions and statements of their Eminences Andronik and Sophrony and
their supporting clergy and laity, following the decisions of the
Ecclesiastical Court.
Resolved: 1.To call upon the group of believers, headed by retired
Archbishops Andronik and Sophrony to discontinue their preparation for
their uncanonical meeting planned by them, and to dissolve their
so-called 'Pre-Council Committee'.They are rather recommended to
participate in the preparation of a canonical All-Diaspora Council of our entire Church, in accordance with the Regulations of ROCOR.
2.
To warn them: that in the event of their lack of repentance, and at the
very moment of the beginning of their unlawful gathering, which they
falsely call the 'All-Diaspora Council', those in priesty rank from
among them will be banned from serving and monastics and laity separated
from Holy Communion.[excommunicated].
3.
Make known that all hierarchical deeds of Archbishops Andronik and
Sophrony, committed by them in violation of the decision of the
Ecclesiastical Court, placing them in a retired status, are invalid.
4. Prepare an additional appeal to the faithful of this group.
5.
In the case that that lawless meeting does take place, the President
and the Secretary are authorised to issue a decree on behalf of the
Council of Bishops, on banning from serving those hierarchs of ROCA who
have participated in this gathering.The ruling bishops are instructed to
ban from serving, their subordinate clergy and to separate from
communion [excommunicate] the laity subordinate to those who have taken
part in that lawless gathering.
JOURNAL №11
Received:
Presentation by the Chairman on the draft "Regulations on the
Conference on the territory of North and South America and Canada."
Resolved:
At present, our Church in America has only one bishop, His Eminence
Gregory [of Sao Paulo and All-South America], In connection with this,
the discussion of the "Regulations on the Conference on the territory of
North and South America and Canada" is postponed until the situation with the other two Bishops is resolved.
JOURNAL №12
Discussed: The suggestion of the Chairman on the boundaries of dioceses.
Resolved:
To approve the decision of the Extraordinary Synod of Bishops regarding
the temporary care of the Canadian and St Nicholas Diocese by His
Eminence Gregory. Appoint His Eminence Gregory to the care of the Mission, along with its communities and parishes.
The
decision of the Extraordinary Synod of Bishops is approved regarding
the temporary care of the St Petersburg [Russian Federation], diocese by
His Eminence Nikon.
The
Far Eastern Federal Disctrict is excluded from the Ishim-Siberia
diocese, and is to be included in the Far Eastern diocese.[under Vladyka
Anastasius].
The
following areas are considered to be part of the Far Eastern diocese:
1. The Far Eastern Federal District (Primorsky Territory, the Khabarovsk
Territory, the Amur region, Sakhalin, Magadan, Kamchatka, Republic of
Sakha (Yakutia), Chukotka Autonomous District); 2. China, 3. The Korean Peninsula, and 4. Japan.
JOURNAL №13
Received: The report of the Chairman on the Delegation of the Synod.
Resolved: The Council took note of the Chairman's report.
JOURNAL №14
Discussed: The composition of the Synod of Bishops.
Resolved:
To approve the following composition of the Synod of Bishops:
Metropolitan Agafangel - President, Bishop.Gregory – Vice President; members of the Synod: Archbishop George - Synod Secretary, Bishop Athanasius, Bishop Kyrill, Bishop Nikon.
JOURNAL №15
Discussed: The Higher Church Authority of ROCA.
Resolved: To defer the final decision on the Higher Church Authority of ROCA , until the coming All-Diaspora Council.
JOURNAL №16
Discussed: The convention of the 6th All-Diaspora Council.
Resolved:
If the group of believers, headed by the retired Archbishops Andronik
and Sophrony respond positively to the appeal of the Council of Bishops,
and if they discontinue preparations for their planned uncanonical
assembly, furthermore, if the group recognises the need to comply with
the requirements of ecclesiastical discipline and dissolves the
so-called 'Pre-Council Committee', THEN the Council of Bishops will return to consideration of the question of convening a Canonical All-Diaspora Sobor, consisting of the fullness of our Church.
JOURNAL №17
Discussed: Replenishment of the episcopate.
Resolved:
To implement the episcopal ordination [consecration] of Abbot John
(Smelic) as vicar bishop of Australia with the title “of Melbourne”.
JOURNAL №18
Discussed:
Aspects of actions by the Chairman and the Secretary of the Synod
[Metropolitan Agafangel and Archbishop George]during their talks
with retired Archbishops Andronik and Sophrony, which were recently held
in the United States in the presence of the representatives of the
Church of the Genuine Christians of Greece, with Metropolitan Demetrios.
Resolved:
To remind the First Hierarch and the Secretary of the Synod, that in
case of the necessity [of himself] to make decisions at variance with
the previous decisions of the Synod, they must correspond with and
notify the other members of the Synod.
JOURNAL №19
Discussed:
The actions of the Chairman in connection with ordinations he performed
without serving the Divine Liturgy,[outside of the Liturgy] and
regarding his sending antimensia by courier.(i.e. by mailing them).
Resolved:
In connection with these admitted violations, to reprimand the Chairman
in accordance with paragraph 32, point a) of the Regulations on the
Ecclesiastical Court of ROCA.
JOURNAL №20
Received: The report of the Chairman on the status of the Synodal Home, [in the USA]
Resolved: The Council took note of the information provided by the Chairman.
JOURNAL №21
Discussed: The draft Appeal to the group of believers under the guidance of retired Archbishops Andronik and Sophrony.
Resolved: To adopt the draft with certain added amendments.
JOURNAL №22
Discussed: The actions and status of Archpriest Oleg Mironov. [currently at St. Xenia Church in Canada].
Resolved: To send a letter on behalf of the Council of Bishops to the His Eminence Demetrios, Metropolitan of America.
======================================================================================================
PLUS this:
The Journal of the Synod of Bishops of the RUSSIAN ORTHODOX CHURCH ABROAD
The
meeting of the Synod of the Russian Orthodox Church Abroad was held
14/27 October 2016 in Odessa, in the Synodal building., Odessa, Ukraine.
Participants: His
Eminence Metropolitan Agafangel - Chairman of the Synod of
Bishops;Their Eminences Archbishop George - Secretary, Bishop Athanassy,
Bishop Gregory - Vice-President, Bishop Nikon.Bishop Kirill took part
in the Synod over Skype.
The work of the Synod was attended by Archbishop John (over Skype), and by Bishops: Nikolai, Anastassy, Roman and Anthim.
JOURNAL №1
Received: Proposition for the Agenda by the Chairman.
Resolved: To accept the agenda of the meeting of the Synod of Bishops in the following form:
1. Awards.
2. Financial Report.
3. Miscellaneous.
JOURNAL №2
Discussed: Archbishop
George suggests awarding Abbot Damian (Vozian) with a Palitsa for his
efforts in the construction of a monastery and church.
Resolved: To award of Abbot Damian (Vozian) the right to wear the Palitsa
JOURNAL №3
Discussed: Archbishop
George suggests awarding priest Roman Kutsitaru with an honorary Cross
for his work in establishing a parish and building a Church.
Resolved: To award priest Roman Kutsitaru with an honorary Cross
JOURNAL №4
Discussed: Archbishop
Gregory suggests awarding deacon Eugene Braga with the dignity of
Archdeacon, for his zealous 16-year ministry in the Church.
Resolved: To grant Deacon Eugene Braga the rank of Archdeacon.
JOURNAL №5
Discussed: The financial report was presented by the Chairman.
Resolved: The Council took note of the financial report.
JOURNAL №6
Discussed: The petition by Bishop Nicholas regarding depriving the previously banned priest Vissarion Tugushi of the priesthood.
Resolved: For
refusing to obey the ruling bishop, the lack of pastoral activity and
conduct defaming the dignity of the priesthood, according to the
petition of Bishop Nicholas, priest Vissarion Tugushi is deprived of the
priesthood.[defrocked]
JOURNAL №7
Discussed: On the management of the ruling bishops of the personal affairs of their subordinate clergy.
Resolved: Remind
the ruling bishops of their obligation to personally keep accurate
records of the personal affairs of subordinate clergy.
JOURNAL №8
Discussed: The time and venue of the next meeting of the Synod of Bishops.
Resolved: The
next meeting of the Synod of Bishops is to be convened from April 19 /
May 2 to 21 April / May 4, 2017 at the Synod office in Odessa
No comments:
Post a Comment
Guest comments MAYBE can be made by email.
joannahigginbotham@runbox.com
Anonymous comments will not be published. Daniel will not see unpublished comments. If you have a message for him, you need to contact him directly.
oregdan@hotmail.com