Tuesday, July 1, 2014

Death of Fr. Herman Podmoshensky

Reader Daniel has just learned that Fr. Herman died yesterday, 6/30/14.
And, May God have mercy upon his soul!
Herman Podmoshensky [born name, Gleb] and Fr. Seraphim (Rose) were the original co-founders of the St. Herman of Alaska Brotherhood, Platina, California

See Internet Sobor article

Brief statement:
This overly kindly version of his life, mainly the part about how and why he was defrocked by ROCOR, and what he did after that, is not the true or full story. This is an overly sympathetic version of the hard unpleasant facts, [ a cover-up version], of a self-appointed 'elder' who in severe prelest/delusions,  and in immense pride, rebelled against the church, his lawful bishop,  and against monastic norms, and thus, he caused much harm to many many souls.[ with the many good things that he did indeed accomplish]. He created a vicious schism in this Western ROCOR diocese, and slandered his biggest friend, our Archbishop Anthony (Medvedev). He had to be defrocked, as he would not REPENT or admit his many wrong doings and grievous sins] But instead,  he refused all discipline and instead made his insane schism, especially in cahoots with the strange sect, 'The Holy Order of Mans' connected to that vagante 'Met. Pangratios Vrionis'.[ a defrocked New Calendar Greek priest, who made himself a 'bishop'].

Also, he secretly accepted the MP, and served together with Pat. Alexis, receiving an award from that man.

Herman totally lost control of the passions of his flesh, [ his main spiritual problem] and he taught others, that such a licentious false way of monastic life, was...alright, acceptable in Orthodox practice and monastic life.[ as long as it was hidden from view].

He and Abbot Panteleimon (Metropoulos] in Boston, were very alike.

As one, among the many,  whom he deeply  hurt and wounded, and slandered and maligned and columniated against, [because I reported, IN ORDER TO STOP HIM, with a number of others,  his terrible misdeeds and harm to souls to our Archbishop Anthony].  I can only say now: MAY ALMIGHTY GOD HAVE MERCY UPON HIS SOUL, FORGIVE HIS MANY SINS, and help me to forgive him!.... I still cannot totally forgive him.

He never apollogized to me, nor asked my forgiveness. He needed to.

I am unable to say or sing, 'Memory Eternal' for him.

His nickname for me, after he left ROCOR, to his many past deluded zombie like cultic followers, who thought that he was 'our living saint', was: 'That scum Everiss!'.  This he repeated over many years to many.

God only knows how many souls, he drove away from Orthodoxy, and even from God.
He even has caused some to disparage Fr. Seraphim, [who himself was  a sincere true ascetic and priest].

And for his immortal soul's sake, I hope that he truly repented before he died. Only God knows that.

But his dark bitter memory to me, is not one of blessedness, but quite the opposite, sad to have to say.

He was the classic false-elder, a dire personage that he warned many to avoid.  Yet, he himself was a prime example, as it turned out.

Reader Daniel Everiss


from Internet Sobor
Yesterday, June 30, in the United States at age 80 reposed a monk of  the Serbian Orthodox Church, formerly abbot of the Russian Orthodox Church Outside of Russia, Herman (Podmoshensky), reported " Russian folk line "cleric ROCOR/MP priest Andrey Rudenko, who knew the deceased.

The name of Father Herman (Podmoshensky) is well known to all fans of the Holy Royal Martyrs, to promote feat which he did a lot. He was a colleague and friend of the now well-known in the Orthodox world, theologian and journalist Hieromonk Seraphim (Rose). Magazines they published "The Orthodox Word" and "Russian Pilgrim," since the Soviet era were distributed in Russia, and were popular among intellectuals interested in the history of the Russian Church, and Russian spirituality.

Give rest, O Lord, to thy servant, the deceased monk Herman and by his prayers have mercy on us sinners.

Curriculum Vitae (based on "Wikipedia")

Father Herman (in the world - Gleb D. Podmoshensky) was born in 1934 in Riga, Latvia. His father was arrested and exiled to Vorkuta, where he died of starvation. Around 1942 he moved with his mother to Germany, and then in the U.S., where he miraculously found faith in God.

In 1962 he graduated from Holy Trinity Seminary in Jordanville. He served as a reader in the Orthodox churches in the United States. In 1963, together with his friend Eugene Rose with the blessing of Archbishop John (Maksimovic) founded in the United States St. Herman's Orthodox Brotherhood, which actively engaged in missionary activity.

In March 1964, together with Eugene opened near the Cathedral in San Francisco a book shop "Orthodox books and icons", which became the center of Orthodox education. Since 1965, together with the publication of the journal which also wase engaged Eugene and St. Herman's Orthodox Brotherhood «The Orthodox Word» («The Orthodox Word").

After the death in 1966 of Archbishop John (Maksimovic) on behalf of the Brotherhood together with Eugene he collected information about miracles wrought by prayer request of St. John. Subsequently, these records made the book "Chronicle of honoring Blessed John."

In the summer of 1967, Gleb and Eugene were able to buy a plot of land a few miles from the small town of Platina in Northern California, where in 1969 the monastery was founded by the St. Herman Brotherhood (later the brotherhood  was converted into an official monastery). 14 (27) October 1970 he was tonsured with the name in honor of the Gherman [ Of Alaska] canonized in the same year, Herman.

In 1976 he was elevated to the priesthood. In 1982 he is mentioned as Abbot, rector of St. Herman desert' [Pustina] in Platina (California, USA). Then  the monastery acted in publishing.efforts. The brethren desert served two other communities: the Church of the Icon of the Theotokos "Surety of Sinners" in Redding (California, USA) and a chapel in the name of the Kursk-Root Icon of the Holy Virgin in Woodbourne (Ore., USA).

In 1980 he participated in the bottom of the New Valaam monastery on an island in Alaska,  Spruce.Island. In total, he participated in the creation of seven monasteries across America.

With the passing of the 1982 Hieromonk Seraphim (Rose) in the monastery began fermentation and trouble. This led to the fact that the decision of the Spiritual Court of the Western American Diocese of June 16, 1988 Abbot Herman (Podmoshensky) was defrocked for violating a variety of canonical rules. Many people who knew German abbot believed the accusations against him contrived and defamatory. [Fr. Herman maintained a false claim of innocence, claiming that he there had been a conspiracy against him.]

Unwilling to acknowledge the deprivation of dignity, together with the inhabitants of the Platina brotherhood, he resigned from the Russian Orthodox Church Abroad and was accepted by Pankraty (Vrioniosom) in a non-canonical jurisdiction "of the Greek Orthodox Archdiocese of America Missionary."

In 1990 he resumed publication of the magazine "Russian pilgrim," which was published in the pre-reform spelling, becoming its editor in chief.

In 2000, in connection with a scandal, he  resigned as abbot of the monastery. Realizing the abnormality of staying in schism, the brethren of the St. Herman desert [Pustina],  began seeking ways to resolve their status. In November 28, 2000 was adopted the brethren of the monastery in the chat into the Serbian Orthodox Church. Ruling Bishop John (Mladenovic) recognized defrocked former abbot Herman legitimate.

In recent years, lived in retirement at St. Seraphim monastery near Minneapolis as a simple monk. Being seriously ill, did not stop missionary service, he wrote books.






Comments from Internet Sobor re: Fr. Herman

See Internet Sobor article
http://internetsobor.org/istoriia-rptcz/istoriia/rptcz/istoriia-rptcz/umer-lishennyi-rptcz-sviashchennogo-sana-gleb-podmoshenskii



# Link to some history of Gleb- — Rd. Daniel 01.07.2014 18:59



# May God Forgive Him! — Rd. Daniel 01.07.2014 17:44
This report is not the full story of his life, nor is it the truth.
Herman (Gleb) Pomoshensky, did indeed accomplish many wonderful things. I personally knew him and Fr. Seraphim.
But, little by little, Herman gave way to the lusts/passions of the flesh, His pride in being a highly respected, staretz/elder, grew and grew. Many young people looked on him and called him, 'our living saint'.
Thus, he harmed many weak souls, because he was not a saint, not at all.
And he showed many signs of some long term mental unbalance, from his tortured and chaotic childhood in soviet Latvia.
When he was called to give a defense for himself to our Archbishop Anthony (Medvedev), he refused to speak the truth or to repent. 
He ended up having to be defrocked from ROCOR, and then he lead a bizarre schism, with himself as its head. He joined himself and his brotherhood to the strange cult, 'The Holy Order of MANS', and also under the vagante 'bishop',"'Met. Pangratios Vrionis". Later his own brotherhood rejected his control, and fled for refuge to the Serbian Patriarchate.
Regretably, I personally know too much about him, as I have suffered much abuse from him and his followers, because I told the truth to our Vladyka Anthony.
I hope that before he died, that he truly repented before God.
But for myself, I cannot say or sing, Vechnaya Pamyat for him.
He lead many astray and he caused a terrible schism in this western US ROCOR diocese.
His memory to me and to the many others he harmed, is a dark unpleasant remembrance.
He spent much of his confused life, in severe prelest/pridefu l delusions, thinking of himself as if he were 'a saint'.
Boston Abbot Panteleimon (Metropolous) and he, were two of the same type.
Rd. Daniel Everiss


# RE: Умер лишенный в РПЦЗ священного сана Глеб Подмошенский — иеромонах Никандр 01.07.2014 13:10
В книге "Не от мира сего" он как то принижает значение о. Серафима , рисуя его идущим под своим чутким руководством. Также Герман имел какую то странную неприязнь к епархиальному архиерею , архиеп. Антонию . Почему ?




# About Vladyka Anthony (Medvedev) and Podmoshensky- — Rd. Daniel 02.07.2014 17:44
Yes, originally, Vladyka Archbishop John Maksimovich, gave Herman and Seraphim his blessing to form their brotherhood,
but then died and went to Heaven.
It was Vladyka Anthony who totally supported, blessed in every way possible, and who ordered the Russian flock in San Francisco to help Platina monastery...for many years, with money, with materials, with their labor to build things there, etcv. I myself drove up to Platina much food donations[ donated by Russians in San Francisco]. and even some bells, from San Francisco.
Vladyka Anthony ordained both fathers, and anything that they requested of him, HE GAVE them!
He was their biggest friend and supporter on earth! 
BUT, when Herman was called by him to come down to San Francisco, and give his response/defens e to the many testimonies against him,[ about a year or so after Fr. Seraphim's passing] Herman refused, and started to label Vladyka, as 'the Devil'.
Even so, Vladyka Anthony gave Herman more than two years, before he had to suspend him, while the Synod in New York ordered him to defrock Herman, much earlier.
At the beginning of that whole scandal, Vladyka Anthony TOTALLY...was on Herman's side, and he suspected a KGB plot against his "holy Igumen".
Vladyka Anthony said: "How could an Igumen do such terrible things!? IMPOSSIBLE! This must be a KGB plot!".
But, Herman would not repent or tell the truth.
So, he constantly slandered Vladyka, and proclaimed him as evil, and a servant of Satan, etc. and one who wanted to destroy his monastery, etc.
He also taught his brotherhood  and his followers, [ mostly converts] ,  that ROCOR was an evil church, because it [the ROCOR bishops]  had persecuted his Vladyka John earlier (all exaggerated LIES!].
These were all total lies of a very in- prelest deranged PROUD man, Herman Podmoshensky.
May God forgive him! 
Rd. Daniel
I was a witness of all this, so I know what I speak of.




# About Fr. Seraphim and Herman- — Rd. Daniel 02.07.2014 19:12
They both were monastic brothers, but Fr. Seraphim put himself under the obedience of Herman,  for his humility sake. Yet, both confessed their sins to each other. Fr. Seraphim was the sincere
ascetic struggler, a man of a very high intelligence, who knew a number of languages (in the church services, he could slip from Slavonic and back to English, without him even knowing any difference, he saw people and life, from a spiritual view, not a worldly or political one.
Fr. Seraphim saw himself as a sinful pilgrim, struggling with the passions of his flesh, JUDGING NO ONE BUT HIMSELF, and he always wanted to end up in the Heavenly New Jerusalem, with Our Lord and His saints. He did not belong in this world.
Herman was a man of this world, a self proclaimed, 'missionary'.
Fr. Seraphim did not seek or want, the praises of people, but Herman did.
Poor Herman, became envious of the real virtues of his monastic brother, and that people respected him.
Fr. Seraphim suffered because he knew of at least some of the secret sins of his brother, but....he refused to condemn or judge Herman, and he kept silence, publically.
However, there is evidence that Fr. Seraphim planned on leaving Platina monastery and his brother Herman, had he lived into another year, as he had had enough of Herman's
unrepentant life, and of Herman constantly making excuses for his sinful ways, etc.
When Fr. Seraphim died, and I was at his all night vigil over his coffin, and funeral on the following day, Herman was totally out of his mind with remorse and guilt and weeping and self-accusation , kneeling down many times at night, in front of the coffin and trying to tell Fr. Seraphim, that he was sorry, etc.
Fr. Seraphim had been the stronger one, the true monastic, and when he departed, Herman was like a ship with no rudder or captain at the wheel.
I can still see Fr. Seraphim's smiling peaceful face in his coffin.
MEMORY ETERNAL to a truly ascetic monastic struggler, Fr. Seraphim, and may he indeed be with the Saints in Heaven.
I firmly believe, that he is there.
Fr. Seraphim never spoke evil against Vladyka Anthony or our ROCOR.
But Herman, threatened to "get a gun and shoot Vladyka Anthony" , [ which threat was recorded on a tape-recorder], when he refused many times to come down to see Vladyka Anthony and give his version of matters, etc.
Fr. Seraphim never spoke evil against ANYONE! 
He carefully followed the old monastic rule to: "Be hard on yourself, but easy on others".
Herman's unrepentant life, that is what hurt and sickened him.
I was a witness to all of this, so I speak the truth.
Furthermore, I have hard evidence,[ gathered from different sources] that Fr. Seraphim was not guilty of the sins of his brother, as some foolish people who did not know him, have wrongly imagined.
Fr. Seraphim was, an angel in the flesh.
Rd. Daniel



# But, We should not make 'saints' out of sinners! — Rd. Daniel 04.07.2014 01:46

Gleb Podmoshensky was a remarkable man. He had an energetic charism, and vitality and bright intelligence and many talents. Everyone who met him, loved him instantly. He loved to be around people. He saw himself as a persecuted elder, like those of the Northern Russian monastic tradition, [the so-called, 'Non-possessors'].  He believed that all bishops, tended  to normally.... persecute righteous elders, [as with Vladyka John Maksimovich... and as with himself too].  He did not trust or like bishops, except Archbishop John Maksimovich. In his life, he accomplished many things, some good, some bad. But, he made cultic schism, he presented himself as a wise spiritual staretz, a teacher of Orthodoxy, he gathered many around him, in a bizarre personality cult, especially here in America, most especially  young people, both naive converts and grand-children of Russian emigrants and others. He mislead many, into harmful ways. He drove a number away from Orthodoxy and from even God. He made his own personal war on our ROCOR church and set himself up, as his own church. He created a cult around himself, as do many schismatics and heretics of all past ages, or of these current times also.

Many of these confused people still think of him as a saint.

I predict that soon they will paint icons of him! and pray TO HIM.

Therefore, now at his passing from this world, we should indeed remember his good deeds, PRAY FOR HIS SOUL, but because of the tremendous evil that he also did, we dare not overly praise him, or elevate him as some sort of a prophet-saint.

HE WAS NOT A SAINT!
However, many will see him as a saint. That is why I give my testimony about him.

And those, as myself, who speak the truth about him, we are vilified and made to seem as liars.

Long ago, making an oath and kissing the Gospels and the Cross, in front of Vladyka Anthony  (Medvede v), I gave my own personal sworn testimony, as did a number of others.

I KNOW OF WHAT I TESTIFY. And, I DO NOT LIE!
But I do not hate Herman, I feel profound sorrow for him.
He and I were close friends, long ago.
He had serious mental and spiritual unbalance.
In human affairs, there is a common tendency to... overly glorify the departed, and to brush over or ignore OR DENY their faults, and in some cases to even proclaim them as some sort of 'a saint'.

In this case of Herman (Gleb) Podmoshensky), only those who personally closely knew him [and who suffered from him] and who have been in this Western US ROCOR diocese for many many years, as I have, can possibly know the full truth about him, good and bad.

Others, only hear pros or cons, [gossip] from the mouths of others, and they do not know the full story.
He will no doubt be buried at Platina Monastery.
May God have mercy upon his soul!
We need to avoid false elders, and false prophets, in these terrible End times. (Fr, Herman himself, taught this warning!)
Gleb Podmoshensky, was among these false elders.

Rd. Daniel



 WARNING: In these various renditions, [some quite odd] there is much mistaken information and a lot of biased opinions.  They are a mix of truth and error.  But, there art a number of interesting and valuable photos.
So, reader, beware!
Rd. Daniel Everiss



According to Portal-Credo.Ru, Monk Herman Podmoshensky, former ROCOR abbot and former colleague of Hieromonk Seraphim Rose, died on 30 June at age 80. Fr Herman (in the world, Gleb D Podmoshensky) was born in 1934 in Riga. In 1962, he graduated from Holy Trinity Seminary (ROCOR) in Jordanville NY USA. Along with Eugene Rose (who later became Fr Seraphim), he founded St Herman of Alaska Monastery in Platina CA USA. In 1970, he received monastic tonsure with the name Herman. In 1976, he became a priest. In 1982, he committed serious ascetic and canonical violations. According to Alexei Young and some other visitors to the monastery, before his death, Seraphim Rose cursed Herman. In 1988, the ROCOR Holy Synod defrocked Abbot Herman Podmoshensky for violating a variety of canonical rules. Unwilling to acknowledge his deprivation of dignity, together with some of the monks at Platina, he left the ROCOR and joined the Greek Orthodox Missionary Archdiocese of America. In 2000, after a new scandal, he resigned as abbot of the monastery. In 2000, the Western American Diocese of the Serbian Orthodox Church brought the monastery brotherhood under its omofor, ergo, ruling Bishop Jovan Mladenović recognised the defrocked former abbot Herman as legitimate. In his last years, Herman lived in retirement at St Seraphim Monastery near Minneapolis MN USA as a simple monk.
30 June 2014
Portal-Credo


Wednesday, June 25, 2014

RTOC & ROAC discuss uniting



Curious News-For Study-RTOC and ROAC Confer about them Unifying with Each other 

     http://internetsobor.org/alternativnoe-pravoslavie/tcerkovnye-novosti/alternativnoe-pravoslavie/obrashchenie-dukhovenstva-i-monashestvuiushchikh-k-arkhiereiskim-sinodam-riptc-i-rpatc


------------------------------------------



Comment: Though this is a google translation,[though humanly improved],  it is easy to understand.

The  main points to focus on in this interesting development , are that both RTOC and ROAC admit that their episcopates, originated with Lazar Zurbenko, and not only on Patriarch Tikhon's Ukaz Number 362.

And they both admit, that...." appeal to  the Synod of Bishops of the RTOC and of RPATs, between which there is no distinction or difference of religious character,"...i.e. they are the same in thought/aims  and church life, etc.

Which to my mind, is a self-condemnation of them, by their own admission.
They have served a great purpose of the MP and the Kremlin, to help further divide the Russian diaspora..

But in the view of our Metropolitan Agafangel and our ROCA Synod, Lazar Zurbenko, when he consecrated or ordained anyone, he himself was at that time, in a canonically deposed state from ROCOR, and thus ALL OF HIS ORDINATIONS were null and void...and thus, NO priests or bishops of RTOC or ROAC, { that were consecrated or ordained by the hands of RTOC or ROAC, after Lazar Zurbenko was lawfully deposed by ROCOR. the church that had originaly made him a bishop], are canonically valid or have Apostolic Succession.... today. NONE!

Also, what is of interest in this news, is that RTOC and ROAC leaders admit that their flocks are asking them, -how can the Greeks unite, and we Russians cannot?, etc.
Yes indeed! what a good question to ask the leaders of RTOC and ROAC!
It is time for the leadership of RTOC and ROAC to give up their bogus claims, and to joln with our ROCA.

Metropolitan Agafangel and his Synod of Bishops, are the SOLE legitimate and canonical continuation of the old free ROCOR.

RTOC and ROAC 'bishops' are imposters and false leaders, misleading their flocks.

And it is very important to call to mind, that our much abused Metropolitan Agafangel, has many many times invited both RTOC and ROAC leaders and clergy and laity, to sit down with him, and our ROCA bishops, and to fraternally discuss differences and to try to find some accommodation, and to make peace....and they have consistently refused, often labeling our ROCA, as 'in heresy' and other slandersl
Rd. Daniel

------------------------------------------

Contact between the clergy and religious to the Synod of Bishops and the Synod of Bishops of the RTOC RPATs


Your Eminence, Bishop Tikhon, 
Your Eminence, Master Theodore, 
His Eminence Russian True Orthodox  
and Russian Orthodox Autonomous Church! 

Asking for your blessings and prayers, we humbly ask you to consider our appeal. 
In current times of apostasy, the  True Russian Orthodox Church is entering a new phase of its existence, when in its confession it tries to keep intact the purity of Holy Orthodoxy, as  Christians may fall again under persecution, and most of the True Orthodox Church will again have to go to the catacomb position.

In this situation, great importance attaches to those canonical principles that underlay the life of the Catacomb True Orthodox Church. Its Founding Fathers and the ideologues from the outset rejected the idea of creating a totalitarian state in the territory of [ the existing canonical Orthodox churches an alternative administration and a centralization of ecclesiastical authority, conforming  her decentralization and self-government in the field, in accordance with the Decree of His Holiness Patriarch Tikhon, the Holy Synod and the Supreme Church Council of the Russian Orthodox Church from 7/20 November 1920 at number 362.

On the basis of this Regulation of this prophetic communication,  Patriarch Tikhon's Catacomb CPI emerged in the Soviet Union and the Russian Orthodox Church Outside of Russia, it is osnovaniemkanonicheskoy legitimacy of both parts of the Russian Church. Now existing jurisdiction (RTOC RPATs, ROCOR (A) ROCA (V)) the canonical base their existence, relying primarily on that  document.

However, this Decision does not concern the creation of the central bodies of the Supreme Church Authority in the Russian Church, but, on the contrary, provides only temporary control of the church authorities "for several dioceses in the same conditions" (see § 2). Therefore, based on the Decree number 362, none of the mentioned parts of the Russian Church can not and has no right to claim to be complete throughout the canonical authority of the Local Russian Church and the ensuing power and authority. It follows that all currently existing parts of the Russian Church on the ground and in the letter of the Patriarchal Decree number 362 are equal only "self-governing Metropolitan Districts," consisting of "several dioceses in the same conditions" (p. 2).

For more information about the canonical value of the Patriarchal Decree number 362 with respect to the present position of the True Orthodox Church there is set forth in the appended to our treatment of historical and canonical note.

Now, as in the 1920-1930-ies., Particularly it is an urgent need to return to the exact исполнениюосновополагающего Investigation and Resolution of St.. Patriarch Tikhon number 362 and relying on him to make every effort to achieving progressively the true unity of the Russian Church, recognizing the possible existence of several parallel ecclesiastical administrative structures ("self-governing metropolitan districts") on the canonical territory of the Russian Church, as it provides Patriarchal Decree number 362 (part 2) in case of emergency and non-legitimate Supreme Church Authority in the face of a legitimate Patriarch, the Synod Council and the fullness of the Local Russian Church (see annex).

Essentially this is the one Church only, in accordance with the Decree of St. . rds. Tikhon number 362, which has a current emergency conditions with different time church management (administration), as it was in the 1920s and '30s.

Since 1927, in Russia there is no canonical supreme ecclesiastical authority in the face of any legitimate Patriarch, the Synod Council and the fullness of the Local Russian Church, the Decree number 362 remains the canonical foundation on which is based not only the existence of all modern branches or parts of the Russian Church, but on the basis of which is  only possible their union. Moreover, it explicitly prescribes  self-governing church districts which  have communion with one another without creating a single administrative structure and subordination of one "small cathedral" (Synod) to another (see annex).

In this regard, in the face of impending trials and persecutions, appeal to the Synod of Bishops and the Synod of Bishops of the RTOC RPATs, between which there is no distinction or difference of religious character, to start a dialogue between the church and the RTOC RPATs in order to recover between [ them] fraternal communion without administrative subordination to each other. 

Both branches of the Russian Church are united not only by a common heritage and history, but also by the general episcopal succession from one bishop - Archbishop Lazar (RTOC and bishops and bishops RPATs at the time they were ordained by Archbishop Lazarus). The fact that the origins of the continuity of the two branches was one bishop, was not coincidental, but providential. And this, we believe, is key to their future unity.

Let us remember that the secret of the Catacomb Church Sobor of  bishops in a transit camp near Irkutsk in 1937 and they ruled as  relatively self-willed branches of the CPI [ One Russian Church] and maintained their prayerful unity among themselves: "All branches of the Church will grow out of one ecclesiastical tree - a tree ... is our pre-revolutionary Church - are the living branches of the Church of Christ. Let there abide prayer and communion between the clergy of all these branches."

Execution of the wills of the Holy New Martyrs and Confessors of the Catacomb shall be the beginning of a dialogue between the fraternal  RTOC and RPATs and, in accordance with the Resolution of the prophetic communication.of  Patriarch Tikhon number 362, restore Eucharistic unity of all parts of the once united the True Russian Church. 

This is especially true for the Russian Church after the unification process begun in the Greek CPI, and many of our parishioners are constantly asking us a question: how did the Greeks findd the strength to unite, and we, Russians, more and more are separated.   

Annex for circulation : 6 pages. 

Signatures:


Signatures:
Jer. Artemy Varlamyan (Lesna monastery RTOC)
Ierom. Euthymius (Trofimov) (Lesna monastery RTOC)
Mont. Euphrosyne (Molchanov) (Lesna monastery RTOC)
Jer. Sergius Myasoedov (Kharkiv, RTOC)
Ierom. Sawa (Carpathian, RTOC)
Archpriest Alexei Lebedev (St. Petersburg, ROAC)
Archpriest Roman Nowakowski (Zheleznovodsk, Stavropol Territory, ROAC)
Archpriest V. (ROAC)





Russian original follows with comments as of 6/26/14

Обращение духовенства и монашествующих к Архиерейским синодам РИПЦ и РПАЦ

щение духовенства и монашествующих 
к Архиерейскому Синоду РИПЦ и Архиерейскому Синоду РПАЦ

Ваше Высокопреосвященство, Владыко Тихон,
Ваше Высокопреосвященство, Владыко Феодор,
Преосвященные Владыки Русской Истинно-Православной 
и Российской Православной Автономной Церквей!

Испрашивая Вашего благословения и молитв, смиренно просим Вас рассмотреть наше обращение.
В нынешние апостасийные времена Истинная Православная Русская Церковь вступает в новую фазу своего бытия, когда за исповедание неповрежденной чистоты Святого Православия на христиан вновь могут обрушиться гонения, а самой Истинно-Православной Церкви опять придется перейти на катакомбное положение.
В этой ситуации большое значение приобретают те канонические принципы, которые были заложены в основу жизнедеятельности Катакомбной Истинно-Православной Церкви. Ее святые отцы-основатели и идеологи с самого начала отказались от идеи создания на территории тоталитарного государства альтернативной администрации и централизации церковной власти, противопоставив ей децентрализацию и самоуправление на местах, в соответствии с Постановлением Святейшего Патриарха Тихона, Священного Синода и Высшего Церковного Совета Православной Российской Церкви от 7/20 ноября 1920 года за № 362.
На основе этого пророческого Постановления св. патриарха Тихона возникли Катакомбная ИПЦ в СССР и РПЦ Заграницей, оно является основаниемканонической легитимности обеих частей единой Русской Церкви. Ныне существующие юрисдикции (РИПЦ, РПАЦ, РПЦЗ(А), РПЦЗ(В)) основывают свое каноническое бытие, опираясь, в первую очередь, на этот документ. 
Однако это Постановление совершенно не касается создания центральных органов Высшей Церковной Власти в Русской Церкви, но, напротив, предусматривает лишь временные органы церковного управления «для нескольких епархий, находящихся в одинаковых условиях» (см. п. 2). Поэтому, опираясь на Постановление № 362, ни одна из упомянутых частей Русской Церкви не может и не имеет права претендовать на полноту канонической власти всей Поместной Российской Церкви с вытекающими отсюда полномочиями и правами. Отсюда следует, что все ныне действующие части Русской Церкви на основании и по букве этого Патриаршего Постановления № 362 являются лишь равноправными «самоуправляющимися митрополичьими округами»,состоящими из «нескольких епархий, находящихся в одинаковых условиях» (п. 2).
Более подробно о каноническом значении Патриаршего Постановления № 362 применительно к современному положению Истинно-Православной Церкви изложено в прилагаемой к нашему обращению историко-канонической записке.
Ныне, как и в 1920-1930-е гг., особую актуальность приобретает необходимость вернуться к точному следованию и исполнениюосновополагающего Постановления св. патриарха Тихона № 362 и, опираясь на него, приложить все усилия к постепенному достижению единства Истинной Русской Церкви, признав возможным существование нескольких параллельных церковно-административных структур («самоуправляющихся митрополичьих округов») на канонической территории Русской Церкви, как это и предусматривает Патриаршее Постановление № 362 (п. 2) на случай чрезвычайного положения и отсутствия легитимной Высшей Церковной Власти в лице законного Патриарха, Собора и Синода всей полноты Поместной Русской Церкви (см. приложение).
По сути это и есть одна Церковь, только, в соответствии с Постановлением св. патр. Тихона № 362, имеющая в нынешних чрезвычайных условиях разные временные церковные управления (администрации), как это и было в 1920-30-е гг.
Поскольку с 1927 г. в России отсутствует каноническая высшая церковная власть в лице законного Патриарха, Собора и Синода всей полноты Поместной Русской Церкви, то Постановление № 362 остается тем каноническим фундаментом, на котором не только основывается существование всех современных ветвей или частей Русской Церкви, но на основе которого только и возможно их объединение. Более того, оно недвусмысленно предписывает иметь самоуправляющимся церковным округам евхаристическое общение между собой без создания единой административной структуры и переподчинения одного «малого собора» (синода) другому (см. приложение).
В связи с этим, пред лицом грядущих испытаний и гонений, обращаемся к Архиерейскому Синоду РИПЦ и Архиерейскому Синоду РПАЦ, между которыми не существует различий или разногласий вероисповедного характера, начать церковный диалог между РИПЦ и РПАЦ, с тем, чтобы восстановить между ними братское евхаристическое общение без административного подчинения друг другу. 
Обе эти ветви Русской Церкви объединяет не только общее наследие и история, но и общая архиерейская преемственность от одного архиерея – архиепископа Лазаря (и епископов РИПЦ, и епископов РПАЦ в свое время рукополагал именно архиепископ Лазарь). Тот факт, что у истоков преемственности обеих ветвей стоял один архиерей, было не случайным, но промыслительным. И в этом, верим, заключается залог их будущего единства.
Будем помнить, что тайный Собор архиереев Катакомбной Церкви в пересыльном лагере под Иркутском в 1937 г. так постановил и завещал относительно самоуправления ветвей ИПЦ и сохранения ими молитвенного единства между собою: «Все ветви Церкви, произрастающие из экклезиастического древа – ... а древом является наша дореволюционная Церковь, – суть живые ветви Церкви Христа. Пусть пребывает молитвенное и литургическое общение между духовенством всех этих ветвей».
Исполнением этого завещания Святых Новомучеников и Исповедников Катакомбных да будет положено начало братского диалога между РИПЦ и РПАЦ и, в соответствии с пророческим Постановлением св. патриарха Тихона № 362, восстановления евхаристического единства всех частей некогда единой Истинной Русской Церкви. 
Это тем более актуально для Русской Церкви после того, как объединительный процесс начался в греческой ИПЦ, и многие наши прихожане постоянно задают нам вопрос: почему греки нашли в себе силы к объединению, а мы, русские, все более и более разделяемся.  

Приложение к обращению: на 6 страницах.

Подписи:

Иер. А. РИПЦ
Иером. Е. РИПЦ
Мон. Е. РИПЦ
Иер. С. РИПЦ
Иером. С.  РИПЦ

Протоиерей Алексей Лебедев (г. Санкт-Петербург, РПАЦ)
Протоиерей Р. РПАЦ
Протоиерей В. РПАЦ
На фото - Архиепископ Лазарь и Епископ Тихон с Чудотворной Иверской иконой Божией Матери Благоухающей


Комментарии   

# От сложения расколов получается еще больший расколо. Виктор 26.06.2014 05:29
Неправдой является утверждение авторов, что Указ #362 заложен в основу РИПЦ и РПАЦ. 

РПАЦ откололась от Синода РПЦЗ митр. Виталия по абсурдному заявлению еп. Валентина, что для него лично вступил в действие Указ #362 , т.к. прежде законное ВЦУ в лице Синода РПЦЗ для него прекратило свое существование: еп. Валентин несколько раз подряд звонил из Суздаля в Нью-Йорк, то не смог дозвониться и поговорить с митр. Виталием! 

РИПЦ тоже откололась от митр. Виталия - от его мансонвильского синода “РПЦ в Изгнании” и произвела для себя неканоничные епископские хиротонии. Основанием откола РИПЦ от раскола “РПЦ в И” послужил не Указ #362, а записка митроп. Виталия где он указывал, что лично не возражает против организации синода на территории РФ, если такое деяние подтвердит мансонвильский собор, если синод в России будет находится в подчинении мансонвильскому синоду, если кандидатуры во епископов для РФ будут им, митрополитом и собором "РПЦ в И" утверждены. Организацию синода РИПЦ мансонвильский Собор не утверждал, кандидатуры во епископов РИПЦ ни митр. Виталием, ни мансонвильским собором не утверждены, самообразованна я РИПЦ в подчинение мансонвильскому синоду не вошла. Какое же отношение записка митр. Виталия имеет к Указу Патриарха #362?

Надо добавить, что если по мнению авторов Обращения между РИПЦ и РПАЦ "не существует различий или разногласий вероисповедного характера", то изначально РИПЦ в РФ не имела права на существование: вместо самовозникновен ия и раскола "РПЦ в И" РИПЦ должна была войти в состав существующей уже в РФ структуры РПАЦ. Таким образом, РИПЦ относительно РПАЦ тоже, с первого дня своего существования - раскол. 

Если РИПЦ и РПАЦ действительно хотят исполнить Патриаршее Постановление № 362, то должны были бы немедленно присоединиться к существовавшей до их самовозникновен ия и существующей до ныне легитимной Высшей Церковной Власти - Синоду РПЦЗ, т.е. присоединиться к митрополиту Агафангелу. Другого пути возвращения из раскола в Церковь нет
Ответить | Ответить с цитатой | Цитировать



# RE: От сложения расколов получается еще больший расколЕлена 26.06.2014 10:54
У Вас устаревший ошибочный административны й взгляд, который и привел РПЦЗ к унии с МП как ВЦУ во главе с патриархом. Вы подменяете евхаристическое единство Церкви как Мистического Тела Христова на единстве административно е. Как мне кажется, в той Историко-канони ческой справке, которая прилагается к этому обращению: catacomb.org.ua/.../ , довольно обоснованно разъясняется, почему ни одна из частей РПЦ не может претендовать на полноту ВЦУ РПЦ. Выглядит все очень убедительно. Ведь действительно Указ 362 никому не дает прав на полноту ВВЦУ, даже РПЦЗ. Скорее всего, вся проблема в неправильном толковании самого Указа 362 и Вами и многими другими, т.с. в стиле административно -бюрократическо го мышления. А ведь Церковь и правда не административно -бюрократически й аппарат
Ответить | Ответить с цитатой | Цитировать



# RTOC and ROAC in America-Rd. Daniel 25.06.2014 15:48
Here, both of those churches are not very large or powerful, but they constantly try to steal from our ROCA, our priests, parishes, and laity.
They constantly slander and malign Met. Agafangel and our ROCA.
RTOC-Trenton, Stefan Sabelnik, [ a basically well meaning but confused man], takes his orders and advice as to what he should do, or say, ... from his close friend ROAC Andre Maklakov.
Maklakov says many strange words, that we could expect from mental patients.
Those who disagree with him, on any church matter he proclaims that they are "Crusifying Christ again on His cross!".
ROAC Maklakov interfers into our ROCA church life, constantly. He claims to be an expert on the canons!!!
Most of the clergy that are under either of them, are rejects from our church, from the old ROCOR, or anyway very mislead and confused souls.
Yes, they as with us, are anti-MP and anti-ecumenist.
I pray for these confused ones, priests and laity, that they wake up and leave RTOC and ROAC and come to us.
Most of them are good people.
But here in America, little ROAC already controls little RTOC-Trenton. It is the fact. But as I view them, they both are dying.
Rd. Daniel
Ответить | Ответить с цитатой | Цитировать



# RE: RTOC and ROAC in America-Митрополит Агафангел 25.06.2014 18:14
Да, конечно - в любом случае мы можем надеяться только на тех людей, которые способны слышать и рассуждать.
Ответить | Ответить с цитатой | Цитировать



# RE: RTOC and ROAC in America-Reader Maxim 26.06.2014 02:11
You are truly a master of listening and reasoning. Take for instance how you overcame your humble nature and accepted the position of metropolitan in your church. Of course, you also knew to omit certain previous ROCOR synodal decisions to get there....but get there you did and now you stand in front of your flock in your metropolitan trappings and dare think that you continue in the footsteps of Met. Vitaly, St. Met. Filaret and those who came before him?!? "Who hath ears to hear , let him hear" (Matt. 13:9)
Ответить | Ответить с цитатой | Цитировать



# RE: Обращение духовенства и монашествующих к Архиерейским синодам РИПЦ и РПАЦМитрополит Агафангел 24.06.2014 18:00
Дай Бог, хоть им объединиться. Но я, лично, утратил веру в то, что они согласятся даже разговаривать друг со другом. Буду счастлив ошибиться, в данном случае.

В истинной Церкви Христовой должен быть заложен в основании Ее принцип созидания, а не дробления и разрушения. "По тому узнают все, что вы Мои ученики, если будете иметь любовь между собою" (Ин 13.35). Это навсегда.
Ответить | Ответить с цитатой | Цитировать



# RE: Обращение духовенства и монашествующих к Архиерейским синодам РИПЦ и РПАЦReader Maxim 26.06.2014 01:41
Dear Bishop Agafangel,
Can you please explain to us, simple laymen, why it is of interest to you, to see ROAC and RTOC (both schismatic churches according to you) uniting?
Ответить | Ответить с цитатой | Цитировать



# No, 'Reader Maxim', Priests and Laity from RTOC & ROAC Need to Come to UsRd. Daniel 26.06.2014 02:44
ROAC and RTOC, have no right to exist even.
They, as jurisdictions, are outside of the One True Orthodox Church.
Yes, they are indeed schismatics and sectarians.
And if you, 'Reader Maxim' were tonsured a reader by their hands, you are not a reader. You are nothing. NOTHING!
And who are you, little man, to be so rude and insolent to our Metropolitan?
None of what you claim here, is true about Metropolitan Agafangel's life. Your nasty and untrue words are only slanders. You clearly know nothing about him or his life or his beliefs or his struggles.
SHAME on you!
He was pressured & voted, by our clergy and laity, to become our Metropolitan, because our church needed him, it was not his wish. HE DID NOT DESIRE THAT TITLE!!
He is truly a humble man...but the big difference between him and your proud and arrogant Tikhon Pasechnik or your ROAC's new head, [Theodore] is that he is the sole canonical continuation of the old free ROCOR. RTOC and ROAC are NOT!!! They are thieves and liars.
Speaking for myself here in America, I pray that the mislead clergy and laity in RTOC and ROAC, wake up, and leave those false churches, and come to our ROCA.
Will those poor people leave those false churches, without their current schismatic leadership guiding them to come to us?
I pray so.
And yes, a very good question from clergy and laity in those two bogus schismatic churches: ..".If the Greeks united, why can't we Russians also unite!?"
ROCA under our Metropolitan Agafangel, is in full fraternal communion with a large part of canonical True Orthodoxy. We are accepted and recognized by them, as THE ONE REAL genuine ROCOR. They do NOT RECOGNIZE your RTOC or ROAC!!!...not at all. And those Greeks, Romanians, and Bulgarians know the canons!
They consider RTOC and ROAC as robbers and uncanonical.
Wake up! and flee those false bishops, 'Reader Maxim'.
Rd. Daniel....very sick and tired of the many lies from RTOC and ROAC, as also from their similar friends in the MP and the ROCiE crowd too.
Ответить | Ответить с цитатой | Цитировать



# RE: Обращение духовенства и монашествующих к Архиерейским синодам РИПЦ и РПАЦЕлена 26.06.2014 10:44
На сайте РИПЦ тоже появилось это Обращение, только с приложением – Историко-канони ческой справкой: catacomb.org.ua/.../
Ответить | Ответить с цитатой | Цитировать



# RE: Обращение духовенства и монашествующих к Архиерейским синодам РИПЦ и РПАЦJoanna Higginbotham 26.06.2014 14:45
Reader Maxim,

Are you an internet goon? How dare you come here into our livingroom and accuse our Vladyka, our HERO who saved ROCOR, of prideful motives? Truly you have no perception of the Church of our Fathers, or you would recognize that you are outside of it. 

We thank God for Metropolitan Agafangel and our holy synod because through them God guides our Ship safely passed the trap of jurisdictional ecumenism. 

There are 2 jurisdictions that originated from Lazar Zurbenko (RTOC and ROAC). But there is ONLY ONE jurisdiction that originates from the ukase #362. It is not RocorMP ,and it is not a group who claims falsely that they are the Catacomb Church.

You owe all of us an apology for speaking to our revered Metropolitan with such disrespect. You insult all of us. And you embarrass yourself.





Saturday, June 21, 2014

A History Of The Russian Church Abroad 1917-1971

and the Events Leading to the American Metropolia's Autocephaly
published by Boston monastery when they were with ROCOR,
 via their Seattle, St. Nektarios Press.....


Reader Daniel "book review" of A History of ROCOR published by St. Nectarios Press.


I have almost finished reading that ROCOR history
> And, it really jogs my memory, as I knew personally or bumped into, a
> > number of those traitor Metropolia bishops & priests, way back then.  In fact,
> > I know MORE about some of them, than is put into this work...
> > But since I first read this work way back in the early 1970's , I now see
> > everything in these pages, from a fresh, though... hindsight.... perspective.,
> > which is causing me to loose ALL respect for those OCA clerical
> > TRAITORS.... just as what all we know about our traitor ROCOR
> > bishops/priests, which knowledge also sickens me ...i.e., the ROCOR traitors
> > have gone down the SAME MP road-to-ruin, as did the OCA traitors before
> > the [autocephaly coup], with only a few differences..
> > And, what is so up-to-date, with all this ....old history, is that it is ALL
> > applicable today... nothing is really new.

This book is enlightening about the whole canonical history, of Russian Orthodoxy in North America....what we have inherited...........

About THE best compilation of the actual factual history of the past days of the N. American Metropolia [a.k.a 'OCA' since 1970], and ROCOR,(i.e., the whole process of it's uniting and then leaving and then reuniting, with the Church Abroad and it's dealings with the MP, etc.) is in the pages of this book.  When you read it, you will see that the multifarious information in it, is applicable and useful to MANY current church issues, MANY!

You may have read it, you may already have a copy of it, though it is long out of print and unavailable....except that I have 5 copies here.
Our Peter Koltypin asked me for a copy, which I sent him, and he has copied this text to share, and raves of it's importance.
My old friend, ________, says of it: it is the only and BEST present source, for this UNASSAILABLE accurate history....... (too bad it is not in Russian too, though a number of it's original  sources were in Russian and other languages).. 

It is:

"A History Of The Russian Church Abroad 1917-1971
and the Events Leading to the American Metropolia's Autocephaly"
published by Boston monastery when they were with ROCOR,
 via their Seattle, St. Nektarios Press.....

It is about 214 pages.

Years ago, when I was still in the OCA, after reading this book, I in good conscience could no longer remain in the OCA, but had to run to ROCOR.

And, nothing in this well-foot noted compilation, is still not of extreme value.