Thursday, April 18, 2013

MP says RocorMP is forgetting its Russian-ness

original Russian

machine English

(Humanized translation follows below introductory commentary.)

 Comment:
It would seem, that the KGB-Kremlin controlled MP is not totally happy with it's new daughter, ROCOR/MP, and for some of the same reasons that it has voiced it's displeasure and disappointments about its captive OCA also.
Both, American based churches, (both of historical-Russian origins, that is quite true), are, now, not 'Russian enough', and are 'too American'.
Of course, what do they in Moscow really mean by such loaded double-meaning political terms?
To the Putin KGB gang in power there, 'Russian-ness' means, to be 100% loyal to and blindly obedient to, ITSELF, as the sole definer and protector of 'Russianism' (the Communist's definitions).
These criminals, of course, are the inheritors of those who murdered off much of that old real Russia, which old Russian culture & religion they now pretend to be promoting (!!!)
And, to be, 'Too American' means... in essence, to these liars in Moscow,  that such people are not/or refuse to be, trustworthy or mindless dupes of theirs, in essence their enemies rather than their dupes.
To Putin and his crew, they seem to have more contempt for those of Russian-blood here, who refuse their embrace, rather than those of non- or, part-Russian blood, as the 'converts', though, there are many people living in America, who are of Russian decent, but who choose to call themselves, Americans.
However, if dear Putin and his fellow KGB agent pal, MP Kyrill-Gundaev had their way, they would clearly wish to eject ALL non-Russian-blooded converts from their captive, 'Russian Church' (both in the OCA and also in their ROCOR/MP), here in their number one 'enemy country', America, in their power hungry twisted neo-communist minds (still bent on world domination).  They feel that they cannot trust, 'Americans', we are all too slippery, too independent..
Rd. Daniel
P.S. By the way, what does the label 'Convert fo Orthodoxy' mean?
This also includes, many many Russians, born and raised under atheistic Communism, who only now are re-discovering Orthodox religion, and are CONVERTING to it.
And where are a lot of these conversions happening?
HERE in the west, and in America.
In the neo-soviet Russian Federation, the tendency of the MP and the neo-soviet government is to declare, 'that all Russians , are BORN Orthodox', an absolutely absurd non-Orthodox and a heretical notion.
Hence there, catechism or instruction in the faith for adults, is often omitted... even any formal baptism, (usually if done, is done by pouring) is also often entirely omitted.

humanized translation:
Russian Orthodox Church Outside,'of forgetting'- 
(i.e., forgetting it's 'Russian-ness'?):

Orthodoxy in the United States is becoming increasingly English-speaking and American in spirit.

   Correspondent: i-sobor incl. April 17, 2013 . Published in the Moscow Patriarchate 
Anna Nizhyns'ka
About the Author: Anna Nizhyns'ka -a  doctoral student of theology and oriental languages.

In the conservative Russian Orthodox Church Outside Russia-(ROCA[MP]), until recently, it firmly defended it's  "Russian character", there are now unprecedented changes.  The Primate of the ROCOR[MP],  Metropolitan Hilarion (Kapral) for the first time in the history of this church, in 2008, has consecrated as bishops, two Americans: Jerome (Jerome Shaw) and George (George Schaefer).

Metropolitan Hilarion himself - is a product [born in Canada], of a Ukrainian Canadian family of immigrants from Volyn, and his predecessor, Metropolitan Laurus (Shkurla) -of a Carpatho/Rusyn family and born and raised in Slovakia, but in the [exile Russian church], they were considered 'Russians'.  Now, with the active participation and blessing of Metropolitan Hilarion, there have  been  ordained an unprecedented number of English-speaking clergy - priests, deacons and readers.

In many parishes of the ROCOR[MP], they have  begun to hold services in English.  In the stronghold of "Russian-ness" at the Holy Trinity Seminary in Jordanville, they have started  teaching in English in addition to Russian.  An elderly priest, who attended the funeral of former First Hierarch Metropolitan Laurus (in 2008), once told me: "I found myself in a crowd where everyone - priests and monks - were talking to each other in English.  For ROCA that was unbelievable only twenty years ago.  And I realized that we live now, in a different world."

A growing number of American converts, affects not only the language but also the style and the  life [culture] of the Church, and even in changing attitudes towards the faith.  This does not mean that the new church and theological language of ROCOR[MP], is  - the language of liberalism, no, on the contrary, it is the language of American conservatism.  Probably the largest group of new believers - are the Southerners [American converts], who had originated from various Protestant churches.  This was characterized in a lecture on the relationship of the shepherd [the bishop], to his  flock, read by Fr. Stephen Ritter of the Ascension Monastery (Resaka, Ga.) and posted on the official website of the ROCOR[MP]. (http://www.eadiocese. Org/News/2013/mar/ritter.en.htm) . The priest spoke of freedom, as... the true content of Orthodoxy, that obedience is not [absolute?] obedience, but rather obedience of the shepherd [to] his flock, & [both to each other, etc.], the spiritual elder and his disciples should deal with each other, in a =mutual manner, and he need not restrict the freedom of his flock, and other things that are not often heard in Orthodox circles in Russia (!).  Fr. Ritter cited specific examples from the life of the Church.  Although the names of those atttending the lecture were not named, but as the church was small,  everyone understood what was being said, what it was about.

Trends in the Americanization of the Church [in ROCOR/MP], must not be in conflict with the way of thinking and the ideas of religious Orthodoxy, for those of  - Russian descent, especially those who are/were not, born in the United States, and who have come from Russia [the old Russia or the present one].  In October 2012 at the Joint Pastoral Conference of the Eastern American Diocese of the ROCOR [MP], and also of the Moscow Patriarchate in the New York-area, a group of priests tried to raise the issue of how [clergy] should treat people [the laity] in the church, to avoid  things that hurt their members.  'People abused by the church' - in America, this is actually a topic that is raised in religious educational institutions, religious periodicals, and there are  books devoted to it.  The Russian organizers of these gatherings, vehemently rejected this initiative and said that all sinful and evil proposals that are discussed regarding these issues at an [Orthodox] church meeting , are unthinkable.  Although in the audience were well known priests, who were ready to share their experiences.  American priests and what they have expressed, have caused bewilderment and [as] costs of the event, were paid for by the Russian Embassy, including a chic dinner's boat.  '$20,000 dollars for a dinner with music '.  One outraged well-known priest said, it would be better for the parishes and churches if that money were given [to them, and not paid for such an event].  In many churches the roof is leaking, and there is nothing to pay utility bills ... "Basically  the Russian church [in America], is not rich, and the Russian ministry of the priest in America [towards Russians ],  - is unprofitable.  Most of the clergy are forced to work on the side [secular occupations], to make ends meet and support their families..

The tensions are exacerbated by a fashionable anti-Americanism, expressed by various religious officials [MP clergy] traveling from Moscow.  "I can not talk to Muscovites - I was told by one [ROCOR/MP], Russian priest, who [himself] had come from Moscow 20 years ago - here is my home, my family, my  congregation, and here is where I serve God, and I do not want to play along with their hostility" [anti-Americanism of the MP clergy].  When I asked him whether it is possible to ignore the [rude] behavior of the Moscow visitors, he nervously exclamed that this issue [opinion] is not circumvented in pastoral communication [but that it is not expedient  for him to duscuss it].

The concept of a "Russian World" which has been launched by Patriarch Kirill, the parishes [in American ROCOR/MP], are taking a very low profile about [being silent about it].  The priests brought up on American soil, most of them do not connect with the 'nationality of Orthodoxy', of an Orthodoxy, perceived as of "Russian Orthodox Christians in America continuing the spiritual tradition of the Russian Orthodox Church, but that the Church is about God, and not power, or people, or culture, etc.", - said one clergyman of the ROCOR[MP]. - Traditionally, the [Russian] Church has been associated with the empire, and led by a [Ruling Monarch].  However, the [monarchal]  Emperor - the Anointed of God, [is gone], and now,  in the absence of that monarchy, I prefer the American ways in which the Church is separated from the state.  I do not interfere in the [secular/political] affairs of the world, and to me, they do not give me their orders, or tell me, what I should do.  The more the state can give me, the more it can also take away."  "We in America [in the ROCOR/MP], know the Patriarch [Kyrill Gundaev], since 1991.  He is very intelligent man, and [back then],  was surprisingly open - as another priest told me. - However, I listened to his presentation of the concept of 'The Russian World' during the community meal in Kiev in 2011.  I knew that she [Russia] and Ukraine do not fit [together], not only because of [what America may desire]."

It does not help the faithful, to make such an approximation of the two countries [Russia and Ukraine], and the fact that [the current realities], do not meet the expectations of some prominent ROCOR[MP] clergy who had hoped for a career in Moscow after the reunification of the Russian Orthodox Church [the MP],  and the ROCOR in 2007.  However, the author conducted an impromptu poll of [their views of] 'Article 14', of American clergy of ROCOR/MP, who were present during  the service of Metropolitan Hilarion at the Annunciation Cathedral in Flushing (New York), and it proved that about the "Russian world" concept [advanced by Pat. Kyrill], only three of them had even heard of it. 

There are other reasons for the conflict.  In American Orthodox organizations [ROCOR/MP], there have been formed the concept of the "family church" where parishes and influence, are passed from father to son [nepotism].  In the Orthodox Church [ROCOR/MP], there is the fear of a  revival of "Grabbizma" - on behalf of [as a legacy from], the past Secretary of the Synod of ROCOR, Bishop of Manhattan Gregory (Grabbe) with Metropolitan Philaret (Voznesensky) (1964-1985).  He [Grabbe], was accused of creating an unhealthy atmosphere of nepotism, corruption and mismanagement.  In the Russian Orthodox Church Outside, [only] a few priests controled the dynasties that controled the whole [Russian Exile Church], church organization and church properties and monies, etc..  Unfortunately, they have become the mainstay of "Russian-ness."

Gaining strength too, has been the "ethnic" conflict within the Eastern American Diocese.  A large group of English-speaking priests and monks, not so long ago turned to Metropolitan Hilarion with a request to leave  that  diocese.  Metropolitan granted them the status of 'stavropegical', [free from the control/obedience to, any local diocesan bishop], and they are now directly subject to the Primate of the Church itself.

Of course, in [America], now are 'blended families' where there is one spouse who is of a non-Russian origin, yet such people have not left the Russian parishes, and their children are speaking in Russian with an accent, [speaking Russian poorly], and they are not bullied in school or at church under the patronage [because of the influence of?], in the  the church, of Scout camps NORR (National Organization of Russian Scouts).  However, the friction [between those of Russian self-identity and the non-Russians?] will exist for a long time [in the American ROCOR/MP].

Although such nepotism in the old pre-revolutionary traditions still [exists] in some places as... priestly dynasties ,[in ROCOR/MP?], but this is probably a nepotism inherent [typical?] in the religious life [zarubeshniki/Exile Russian Orthodox?],  of the United States.  America is able to adapt [change] (perhaps the real meaning here is, to corrupt?)- everything that it comes into contact with, even the Russian Orthodox Church.

New York

Monday, April 15, 2013

Kerry is making us Safe

Dennis Rodman planning on having some fun with Kim Jong Un, while Sec. of State Kerry, is making us Safe from N. Korean Nukes: i.e 'ALL IS WELL!, We have Nothing to fear! (???)

Comment: Sorry for contributing to any humour in lent, but this sterling and reassuring news, gives me..chuckles.* A motto superimposed on a large wall poster of the British Union Jack, in England, during WWII:
"KEEP CALM and CARRY ON"...certainly applicable to our present situation.
Dennis Rodman planning to 'have some fun' with North Korea's Kim Jong Un in August
Published April 15, 2013
FoxNews.com
  • Feb. 28, 2013: North Korean leader Kim Jong Un, left, and former NBA star Dennis Rodman watch North Korean and U.S. players in an exhibition basketball game at an arena in Pyongyang, North Korea. (AP/VICE Media) 
North Korea's increasing hostility toward the rest of the world doesn't seem to faze dictator Kim Jong Un's newest best friend Dennis Rodman, who reiterated his plans to return to the communist nation in August.
The former U.S. basketball star said at a charity event in Miami Beach over the weekend that he's keeping plans to visit North Korea again in late summer to have "fun" with the country's dictator, the website "Gossip Extra" reported.
"I’m going back August 1," he told the websiteImported Image.tiff. "We have no plans really, as far as what we’re going to do over there, but we’ll just hang and have some fun!"
Rodman raised eyebrows when he became the first American to meet the reclusive young leader in a visit to Pyongyang in February. 
Weeks after the controversial visit, Rodman, 51, described Kim as a friend.
"I don't condone what he does, but he's my friend," Rodman said in a March interview with North Dakota's KXJB. Rodman continued to say he will be "vacationing" with Kim in August.
Rodman's remarks come amid rising tensions between North Korea and the United States, after the Asian nation threatened to launch a preemptive nuclear attack on the U.S. that would engulf Washington in a "sea of fire."
U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry last week wrapped up a tour to coordinate Washington's response with Beijing, North Korea's most important ally, as well as with Seoul and Tokyo.
In Seoul, South Korean Defense Minister Kim Kwan-jin told a parliamentary committee Monday that North Korea still appeared poised to launch a missile from its east coast, though he declined to disclose the source of his information.
Kerry warned North Korea not to conduct a missile test, saying it would be provocation that "will raise people's temperatures" and further isolate the country and its impoverished people. He said Sunday that the U.S. was "prepared to reach out," but that Pyongyang must first bring down tensions and honor previous agreements.
The Associated Press contributed to this report. 






Sunday, April 14, 2013

Nationality in Russia Defined By Religion

from Paul Goble: "Nationality in Russia Increasingly Defined By Religion"


Commentary by Sbn. Konstantin Preobrazhensky follows below

EXACTLY A TRUE AND correct an analysis!

Thursday, April 11, 2013
Window on Eurasia: Nationality in Russia Increasingly Defined by Religion, Moscow Scholar Says

Paul Goble

Staunton, April 11 – A most dangerous trend in Russian social and political life is “’the nationalization’of religion,” transforming it from one ethnic characteristic among many into“the most important component of ethno-national identity” and “the basis for the development of nationalistic attitudes,” according to a Moscow scholar.

This trend is particularly threatening because it holds not only for Islam but also for Orthodoxy and “all [the other] faiths of Russia, including the shamanism of the northern peoples,”according to Tatyana Koval, a professor at Moscow’s Higher School of Economics (religiopolis.org/religiovedenie/6138-politizatsija-religii-prepjatstvuet-duhovnomu-ozdorovleniju.html).

From Soviet times on, observers have talked about “ethnic Muslims,” people who are members of traditionally Islamic nationalities but who know little about the faith and do not consciously follow its precepts. But Russians have been less prepared to use the same terminology for other religious groups, even though it is obviously relevant.

Koval focuses her remarks on the Russian Orthodox. She notes that “the overwhelming majority of Russians – some 75 percent – call themselves Orthodox but at the same time almost half of them do not believe in God.” And that“ethnic principle,” which holds that “Russian means Orthodox,” is also supported by the Russian Orthodox Church.

By routinely speaking about “the cultural canonical territory,” the Church “in other words” is accepting the idea that “attachment to religion ‘by blood’ does not require either the presence of faith as such or knowledge about the bases of doctrine or even about religious practice or fulfillment of the commandments.”

Instead, Koval says, this idea“reanimates archaic aspects of consciousness and easily can become an instrument of political mobilization and a means for unity against any common, if dreamed up ‘enemy,’ a milieu for the development of aggression and force committed ‘in the name of God,’ ‘for the defense of faith and the church,’ and so on.”

A similar pattern holds for most other religions in the Russian Federation at the present time, she continues, and this “gives birth to ethnic conflicts under religious banners,” something that makes them more difficult to address or overcome and thus more dangerous for both individuals and society as a whole.

This is just one of three ways that“the religious renaissance in Russia” is not unifying people in that country but rather “in many respects dividing” them, the scholar says, as the events of the last year have shown. The situation has become so dire, she suggests, that many researchers in this area are now speaking of “two peoples and two churches.”

The second divisive tendency is “the politicization of religion,” the scholar argues. In recent years, Koval says,“the Russian Orthodox Church has ever more become not only a religious instrument but an important independent political player both on the territory of Russia and in the world, in the first instance on the post-Soviet space.”

The ROC “ever more recalls a closed corporation” with a distinctive authoritarian and imperial program, interested in “a symphony with the state,” a rejection of democracy in favor of monarchy, and the promotion of a “Russian world” geopolitical project. And it has as a result, “politicized the issue of the number of Orthodox believers.”

With a slight delay, the Church has constructed within its hierarchy “a power vertical” and “a year ago,” it appeared to many in the Russian Federtion that there was “a new power tandem, the President and the Patriarch,” especially since “a number of senior government officials” were brought it to head “religious organizations and foundations.”

And third, the Higher School of Economics professor says, by focusing on political activity rather than the care of its flock, the ROC has promoted “the ideologization of religion.”Orthodoxy in this conception “plays the role of an ideology” which “is becoming almost ‘obligatory’ for many in the leading political parties and state structures.”

This ideology can be defined as“statist” and oriented toward a “great power” point of view. That represents a major departure from the early 1990s and means that the Church is increasingly oriented “toward anti-democratic ideas and authoritarian forms of rule” in the Russian Federation.

At the same time, the social activity of the Church has declined, and as a result, “it is losing out to other religious organizations above all Protestant ones in the organization and mobilization of believers” who are interested in acting on their religious convictions by helping the poor and the disadvantaged.

All three of these trends “are becoming especially dangerous under the conditions of the colossal gap between external religiosity and complete ignorance of the bases of the faith among Russians,” Koval says, and as a result, “we see not the rebirth of the Orthodox faith,  but religious syncretism, the rebirth of paganism, archaic faiths, magic and witchcraft.”

(In yesterday’s “Rossiiskaya gazeta,” director Andrey Konchalovsky makes exactly the same point, arguing that at the present time, most ethnic Russians are in fact pagans regardless of what they tell each other or themselves (rg.ru/2013/04/10/vera.html).)

The ROC has made this situation worse by distorting underlying Christian values, stressing the sinful nature of man and his inability to overcome it “without the help of Church pastors and government bureaucrats” – a sharp contrast to Western Christianity with its stress on a natural moral law.” As a result, the ROC says that “’secular humanism’” is “the main enemy.”

This is “a mistake in principle,”Koval says, “because namely secular humanism and a sincere faith can be the main allies in the struggle with the real enemy of the common good – anger and hatred, the destruction of life … the demeaning of human dignity and the undermining of justice.”

Unless the ROC changes its social doctrine to bring it “into correspondence with constitutional” ideas and supports love, mercy and forgiveness rather than “the establishment of detachments of “Orthodox militants and similar groups,” she concludes, “the spiritual and moral recovery of society will hardly be complete.”



Another slant

Commentary by Sbn. Konstantin Preobrazhensky 
Dear Brother Daniel:

Paul Goble is a typical American humanitarian scholar.  What do I mean?  It means that sometimes Americans can not see a difference between reliable and false Russian sources.  That is why Putin is deceiving America so successfully, by the way.

Paul Goble refers to a Tatyana Koval, a professor at Moscow’s Higher School of Economics. But who is she? I have never heard such a name as an authority in religious matters. Why should I believe her? And also Paul Goble refers to the following phrase of this doubtful professor: "From Soviet times on, observers have talked about “ethnic Muslims.”

It is simply not true!  There was no such a phrase in Soviet historical science and journalism! I say it as a former Soviet historian and journalist myself.  Sometimes it was used, but in a different context: "Muslim peoples".  But it was related only to foreign Muslims! It could not be related to the Soviet Union, where all the nations were supposed to give up all religion! And to great extent they have done it!

None of the Soviet historians or journalists could dare using such a phrase as, for example, "Uzbeks are ethnic Muslims".

Such a phrase could cost a writer his career!  He could be expelled from the Communist Party and lose a position as a Professor.  He was allowed to say only the following: " Uzbeks are a Soviet nation, a part of a new historical integrity, the Soviet people.  Unfortunately, some part of Uzbeks did not get rid of the relics of religion, but they are doing it now very successfully."  And a Head of Kazakhstan was reporting proudly to the Central Committee of the Communist Party: "The Kazakh people have given up religion very easily!"  And it was not a falsehood either! As Islam had gotten a very weak spread in Kazakhstan.

And also the phrase by this doubtful historian, Tatiana Koval, is incorrect from a historical point of view! Because the oldest nation of the so called "ethnic Muslims" of Russia, the Tatars, are not only Muslims! A part of them are Orthodox Christians.  They are called "Kryastchens", which means "baptized". They exist since 17th century!  In Kazan and other places of Tataria they have Russian Orthodox churches, where the sermon is delivered in the Tatarian language.

Shame on the so called Professor Tatiana Koval!

And I am very much disappointed with the fact that Paul Goble, such an outstanding scholar, could write such an nonprofessional article.

Please, dear Brother Daniel, make my comments public and forward them to Paul Goble.

In Christ,
Subdeacon Konstantin (Preobrazhinsky)-



Comments of Archb. Chrysostom of Etna, on this article by Paul Goble: 

March 30, 2013 (Old Style)
St. John Klimakos
To: Exarchate Clergy, Faithful, and Friends:
From: Archbishop Chrysostomos


Ελογία Κυρίου.

Two matters from questions and correspondence that arrived while I was away from the monastery, and which I will try to answer, now, following my return last evening.

First, further to the issue of Putin's Oligarchy and his mistreatment of minorities, both ethnic and religious, therein—about which I received a number of notes and some very interesting material—a recent report by Paul Goble (see the link below) makes some tangential observations which contribute to that conversation. Putin's régime has posed very effectively as one that promotes the religious and cultural values of Orthodoxy. As you all know, I dispute this as a false claim, since an Orthodoxy that claims its primacy in the context of denying personal and civil rights to minority ethnic (cultural) and religious groups is not an authentic Orthodoxy. If we adhere to the Patristic ideals (and Orthodox have admittedly not always done so historically ), we do not preach primacy in an exclusionary context and at the cost of usurping the  civil freedom of the non-Orthodox. Thus, the obvious and undeniable favoritism shown by Putin's government to its "official" Orthodox Church is reprehensible. 

Moreover, even if one were to argue for certain perquisites and special consideration for one religion over another, by virtue of preserving the dominant cultural or national traditions of a nation of ethnic group, Putin assuredly does not grant this consideration to Orthodox by virtue of their adherence to the Faith and traditions of their ancestors. After, all his government openly persecutes Orthodox groups, such as our Sister Church under Metropolitan Agafangel, that are separated over matters of genuine spiritual tradition on account of the innovations, history of collaboration with the Soviets by its Hierarchy, and political orientation of the Moscow Patriarchate. These groups are treated manifestly unjustly and experience undeniable persecution, despite their traditional Orthodox confession. Contrived "officialdom" visited upon a body by a political entity of questionable Orthodoxy itself does not constitute a viable criterion for Orthodox legitimacy. 

The fact is, as any rational and intelligent observer can determine, that Putin's Oligarchy has simply enfranchised the Moscow Patriarchate as an instrument of its internal and external political policies. Through it, the State strives to create political solidarity and an international presence outside Russia, the latter goal through the enlistment of Russian Orthodox religious communities into its quasi-imperialistic aims by exploiting their ethnic and nationalistic sentiments. Were this not so, it would welcome the traditional opponents of the Moscow Patriarchate as rich contributors to the revival and preservation of Orthodox tradition in an increasingly religiously diverse Russia.  Putin's Oligarchy, however, is interested, not in religious tradition, but in using the power of religious tradition for its political purposes.

As the article below affirms, almost half of those who are part of the "rebirth" of Orthodoxy in Russia, while claiming to be Orthodox, do not believe in God! This statistic alone offers very powerful reinforcement for my argument that Putin—himself the clumsy product of a false claim to religious belief and a commitment to democratic values, as anyone familiar with multi-national intelligence reports of his actual activities as a KGB officer (read: virtual thug) in the former German "Democratic" Republic (East Germany) knows—is not in the least interested in Orthodox religious traditions, but is using the Russian Orthodox Patriarchate to further his sundry political agenda. The sanitized religious leader of Russia (with his supposed outstanding intellectual achievements and his doctoral degree in Economics) is as much a creation of the Soviet legacy that lies at the foundation of his Oligarchy ("Russia") as the Moscow Patriarchate, with its active promotion of an Orthodoxy stripped of belief in God!

Naive westerners who have not lived or worked in an Eastern European country are quick to imagine that Putin's Russia is either a democratic state (to those who have basic reading abilities and a rudimentary knowledge of social and political trends in Russia today, this is comical), or have bought into the myth that Putin is recreating the old Russian Empire (if so, assuredly without its solid Orthodox foundations and the virtues in its leader and people necessary for a monarchical system to work effectively and justly). Putin's Oligarchy operates on murder, corruption, and duplicity in a state founded by former KGB agents and cutthroats who do not deserve, whatever their political clout in a greedy world in which politics has become dirtier than one could ever have imagined, the honor of being called leaders or statesmen. A number of Russian journalists and film makers have made this quite clear in exposés that have reached the West of late, and they unequivocally point out that Putin's Oligarchy is not a democracy. Putin's "Orthodox" Russian State is also not Orthodox, for the greater part, and does not in any way convey the values and inner spiritual core of the Orthodox ethos that once transformed Russia.

The second matter that I would like to address is pertinent only to our Greek-speaking faithful. …...

** Ironically, if one wants to find something akin to unintelligent inconsistency, keep the Stalinist formula for writing in mind while reading the prolix and pleonastic tomes of Marxist political theory or the surviving poetry of Stalin himself, who wrote verses with a beauty that today's effete critics would dismiss as romantic and which the equally unskilled critics of his own creation might have called "bourgeois".

Friday, April 12, 2013

Christianity is the most persecuted religion

Well, No Surprise To Genuine Orthodox Christians!-"Christianity is the most persecuted religion in the world'

Christians are harassed in more countries -- 130 -- than any other religion in the world.
USA TODAY

Comment: And this astute conclusion has been reached, by some western leaders, while at the same time, most in the 'free-west' know nothing or could care less, about the on-going governmental/apostate  persecution of genuine Orthodox Christians in their own homelands, (most inside the former soviet orbit), a denial of any real meaning to 'religious freedom'. 

One picture is worth a thousand words

Just Sharing what was shared with me: "Idiots cling to one another"

Comment: As the old Chinese saying puts it so well:
"One picture is worth a thousand words".
However, this priceless approval & recommendation of Obama, 
by 'His All-Holiness, Patriarch of All Russia', KGB agent K. Gundaev,
is certainly worth everlasting noting also, and/or some ironic laughs
 to us Americans suffering under him.
Afterall, they both, comrades,  are working towards the same ends.
"Birds of a feather, fly together". (?)..or is it. 'flock together'?