Sunday, January 15, 2017

Comment on Fr. Andrei Erastov, by Met. Agafangel

Comment on Fr. Andrei Erastov, by Met. Agafangel:

Add star 

Dan Everiss

Sun, Jan 15, 2017 at 10:41 AM
Surprisingly, Fr. Andrey Erastov  read his report on the "metropolitan-districts" and after the adoption of the resolution, "calls for the ordained clergy  and  the laity  of  the church to not recognize the jurisdiction of Metropolitan Agafangel and his Synod," which statement he signed. What is on his side?: naivety, hypocrisy, or "dizziness"?
Met. Agafangel


  1. Where is this comment found? Internet Sobor? Facebook? What is the url? The date? The post?

  2. here:

    archive screen shot:

    So, tell us Daniel, what does this mean in human English? Spellbound Fr. Andrei says that all the fragments should recognize each other in a mutual-self-validation of each other, but that ROCA is not to be recognized by them as valid. (?)

    I agree with Vl. Agafangel that this is surprising. Herod is forced to speak the truth even against his will. ROCA will not be included in the future imagined fragment alliance. Yes, this is true. We are excluded even before the fragment alliance is official.

    It is the same as when the ROCA was excluded from the left-wing SCOBA. Fr. Andrei is speaking true against his will, prophesying without being aware. ROCA will not be part of any ecumenist organization, whether it be left wing (world orthodoxy) or right wing (fragment alliance).


I, Joanna Higginbotham, administrator and comment moderator of this blog, do solemnly swear that Anonymous comments will not be published. Include your jurisdiction, rank/status (priest, layman, monk, catechumen, etc.). Use the NAME/URL option to enter a name or pseudonym. Reader Daniel will not see your unpublished comment, so if you have a message for him, contact him directly: